Changes of Arterial Blood Gases After Different Ranges of Surgical Lung Resection
Vesna Cukic, Vladimir Lovre
Mat Soc Med. 2012; 24(3): 165-170
Introduction: In recent years there has been increase in the number of patients who need thoracic surgery – first of all different types of pulmonary resection because of primary bronchial cancer, and very often among patients whose lung function is impaired due to different degree of bronchial obstruction so it is necessary to assess functional status before and after lung surgery to avoid the development of respiratory insufficiency. Objective: to show the changes in the level of arterial blood gases after various ranges of lung resection. Material and methods: The study was done on 71 patients surgically treated at the Clinic for Thoracic Surgery KCU Sarajevo, who were previously treated at the Clinic for Pulmonary Diseases “Podhrastovi” in the period from 01. 06. 2009. to 01. 09. 2011. Different types of lung resection were made. Patients whose percentage of ppoFEV1 was (prognosed postoperative FEV1) was less than 30% of normal values of FEV1 for that patients were not given a permission for lung resection. We monitored the changes in levels-partial pressures of blood gases (PaO2, PaCO2 and SaO2) one and two months after resection and compared them to preoperative values. As there were no significant differences between the values obtained one and two months after surgery, in the results we showed arterial blood gas analysis obtained two months after surgical resection. Results were statistically analyzed by SPSS and Microsoft Office Excel. Statistical significance was determined at an interval of 95%. Results: In 59 patients (83%) there was an increase, and in 12 patients (17%) there was a decrease of PaO2, compared to preoperative values. In 58 patients (82%) there was a decrease, and in 13 patients (18%) there was an increase in PaCO2, compared to preoperative values. For all subjects (group as whole): The value of the PaO2 was significantly increased after lung surgery compared to preoperative values (p <0.05) so is the value of the SaO2%. The value of the PaCO2 was significantly decreased after lung surgery compared to preoperative values (p <0.05). Respiratory insufficiency was developed in none of patients. Conclusion: If the % ppoFEV1 (% prognosed postoperative FEV1) is bigger than 30% of normal values of FEV1 (according to sex, weight, height, age) in patient planned for lung resection surgery there is no development of respiratory insufficiency after resection.
1. Win T, Jackson A, Shraples L, Groves A, Wells FC, Ritchie AJ. Laroche CM. Relationship between pulmonary function and lung cancer surgical outcome. Eur Respir J. 2005; 25: 594-599.
2. Kearney DJ, Lee T, Reilly J, Decamp M, Surgabaker DJ . Assessment of operative risk in patients undergoing lung resection. Importance of predicted pulmonary function.Chest. 1994; 105: 753-759.
3. Tissi GM. Preoperative evaluation of pulmonary function. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1979; 119: 293-310.
4. Gerson G. Preoperative respiratory function tests and postoperative mortality. A study of patients undergoing surgery for carcinoma of the bronchus. Br J Anesth. 1969; 41: 967-971.
5. Gass GD, Olsen GN. Preoperative pulmonary function testing to predict postoperative morbidity and mortality. Chest. 1986; 89: 127-135.
6. Berchard D. Pulmonary function testing in diagnostic procedures for thoracic diseases. Philadelphia, WB Saunders, LoCicero J. III ed. 1992.
7. British Thoracic Society, Society of Cardiothoracic Surgeons of Great Britain and Ireland Working Party. BTS guidelines on the selection of patients with lung cancer for surgery. Thorax. 2001; 56: 89-108.
8. Beckles MA, Spiro SG, Colice GL, Rudd RM. American College of Chest Physicians. The physiologic evaluation of patients with lung cancer being considered for resection surgery. Chest. 2003; Suppl.1: 105S-114S.
9. Stein M, Koota G, Simon M, Frank H. Pulmonary evaluation of surgical patients. JAMA. 1962; 181: 765-768.
10. Markos J, Mullan BP, Hillman DR. Preoperative assessment as a predictor of mortality and morbidity after lung resection. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1989; 139: 902-910.
11. Nomura A, Stemmermann G, Chyon P, Marcus GB, Buist AS. Prospective study of pulmonary function and lung cancer. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1991; 144: 307-311.
12. Skillrud DM, Offord KP, Miller RD. Higher risk of lung cancer in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Ann Intern Med. 1986; 105: 503-507.
13. Pecora DV. Evaluation of cardiopulmonary reserve in candidates for chest surgery. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1962; 44: 60-66.
14. Miller JI, Grossman GD, Hatcher CR. Pulmonary functiontest criteria for operability and pulmonary resection. Surg Gynecol Obstet. 1981; 153: 893-895.
15. Miller JI. Physiologic evaluation of pulmonary function in the candidate for lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1993; 105: 347-351.
16. Putnam JB, Colon R, McMutray MJ, Ali MK, Roth JA. Predicted pulmonary function and survival after pneumectomy for primary lung carcinoma. Ann Thorac Surg. 1990; 49: 909-914.
17. Bolliger CT, Guckel S, Engel H and al. Prediction of functional reserves after lung resection: comparison between quantitative computered tomography, scintigraphy and anatomy. Respiration. 2002; 69: 482-489.
18. Pierce RJ, Copland KS, Barter CE. Preoperative risk evaluation for lung cancer. Predicted postoperative product as a predictor of surgical mortality. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1994; 150: 947-955.
19. Nakahara K, Ohno K, Hashimoto J et al. Prediction of postoperative respiratory failure in patients undergoing lung resection for lung cancer. Ann Thorac Surg. 1988; 46: 549-552.
20. Segal JJ, Buterworthh BA. Ventilatory capacity in chronic bronchitis in relation to carbon dioxide retention. Scand J Resp Dis. 1966; 47: 215-220.
21. Zether BG, Gross TJ, Kern JA and. al. Predicting postoperative pulmonary function in patients undergoing lung resection. Chest. 1995; 108: 69-72.
22. Andjelić B, Milicević B, Major Z. Preoperativno ispitivanje plućne funkcije. Najnovija shvatanja. Pneumon. 2000: 38 (1-20): 95-99.
23. Le Roy Ladurie M, Ranson- Bitker B. Uncertainties in the expected value for forced expiratory volume in one second after surgery. Chest. 1986; 90: 223-228.
24. Boysen PG. Pulmonary resection and postoperative pulmonary function. Chest. 1980; 77: 718-719.
25. Fergusson MK, Reader LB, Mick R. Optimising selection of patients for major lung resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1995; 109: 275-283.
26. Fee JH, Holmes EC, Swenson EV and al. Role of pulmonary vascular resistance measurements in preoperative evaluation of candidates for pulmonary resection. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 1975; 75: 519-524.
27. Ali J, Weisel RD, Layung B et al. Consequences of postoperative alterations in respiratory mechanisms. Am J Surg 1974; 128: 376- 382.
28. Laws AK. Effects of induction of anaesthesia and muscle paralysis on functional residual capacity of the lungs. Can Anaesth Soc. 1968; 15: 325-331.
29. Rendher K, Hatch DJ, Sessler AD and al. Effects of general anesthesia, muscle paralysis and mechanical ventilation on pulmonary nitrogen clearance. Anesthesiology. 1971; 35: 591-601.
30. Gournand A, Reily BL, Himmelstein A, Austrian A. Pulmonary circulation and alveolar-perfusion relationship after pneumonectomy. J Thorac Surg. 1950; 19: 80-116.
31. Eugene J, Brown SE, Ligh RV and al. Maximum oxygen consumption: a physiologic guide to pulmonary resection. Surg Forum. 1982; 33: 260-262.
32. Hamzagić H. Ocjena operabilnosti bolesnika. U: Savremene mogućnosti klinicke fiziologije disanja, Univerzitetska knjiga Sarajevo, 1999; 327-333.
33. Harpole DH, Liptay MJ, DeCamp MM. Prospective analysis of pneumonectomy risk factors for major morbidity and cardiac disrrhythmias. Ann Thorac Surg. 1966; 61: 977-982.
34. Damhuis RA, Schutte PR. Resection rates and postoperative mortality in 7899 patients with lung cancer. Eur Respir J. 1996; 9: 7-10.
35. Wahi R, McMurty MJ, DeCaro LF et al. Determinations of preoperative morbidity and mortality after pneumonectomy. Ann Thorac Surg. 1989; 48: 33-37.