Challenges in the Successful Research Management of a Collaborative EU Project
Dimitrios Zikos, Marianna Diomidous, John Mantas
Acta Inform Med. 2012; 20(1): 15-17
Introduction: Successful research management requirements include; equal teamwork and efficient coordination, in order to increase the impact of the research outcomes and provide added value knowledge. Aim of this paper is to discuss the strategies that have been followed during the RN4CAST study, the largest nursing multi-country research project ever conducted in Europe. The paper focuses on the core research strategies rather than on the administrative activities, which are inevitably also required for the success of a large scale research. Results and discussion: This paper is an extension of a conference presentation in the International Conference of the European Federation for Medical Informatics (MIE) 2011 in Oslo, and was subsequently published in the Studies in Health Technology and Informatics book series (IOS Press) under the title “Research management: the case of RN4CAST.” Management of a multi-country nursing survey requires the use of common data collection tools, applicable to every context, research protocols supporting the scope of the research, data models for multi-country analyses and global dissemination strategies. Challenges that may be faced during the implementation of the study include the individualized confrontation of obstacles during data collection, the coherence of national procedures (for example permissions for data collection) in European level, and the challenge to gain information of added value for the EU, by aggregating the national survey results through a powerful data analysis model. Communication strategies are also discussed.
1. Russel R. Management of Research. Nature. 1947; 160(4068): 547.
2. Smith W. Research management. Science. 1970; 167(3920): 957-9.
3. Peiró S, Artells Herrero JJ. Management of research in healthcare centers. An exploration through nominal group dynamics. Gac Sanit. 2001; 15(3): 245-50.
4. De Rosa C, Rosemond ZA, Cibulas W, Gilman AP. Research management in the Great Lakes and St. Lawrence River basins: challenges and opportunities. Environ Res. 1999; 80(3): 274-9.
5. Zhang WY, Zheng J, Li YC. Practice and experience of the scientific research management. Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue. 2003; 9(8): 634-8.
6. Zikos D, Mantas J. Research management: the case of RN4CAST. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2011; 169: 985-8.
7. Merry L, Gagnon AJ, Thomas J. The research program coordinator: an example of effective management. J Prof Nurs. 2010; 26(4): 223-31.
8. The RN4CAST project official website. Online. Available from: www.rn4cast.eu
9. Needleman J, Buerhaus P, Mattke S, Stewart M, Zelevinsky K: Nurse-staffing levels and the quality of care in hospitals. N Engl J Med. 2002; 346: 1715-1722.
10. Polit D, Beck C, Owen SV: Is the CVI an acceptable indicator of content validity? Appraisal and recommendations. Res Nurs Health. 2007; 30: 459-467.
11. Sermeus W, Aiken L, van den Hede K, Rafferty AM, Griffiths P, Moreno-Casbas M, Busse R, Tishelman C, Scott A, Bruyneel L, Brzostek T, Kinnunen J, Schubert M, Schoonhoven L, Zikos D, RN4CAST Consortium. Nurse forecasting in Europe (RN4CAST): Rationale, design and methodology. BMC Nursing 2011; 10:6.