The Importance of the First Ultrasonic exam of Newborn Hips - Zdravlje, medicina, lijecenje, zdravstveni portal

The Importance of the First Ultrasonic exam of Newborn Hips

The Importance of the First Ultrasonic exam of Newborn Hips
Predrag Grubor, Mithat Asotic, Mirza Biscevic, Milan Grubor
Med Arh. 2012; 66(4): 255-257

View PDF Fulltext

Abstract

Introduction: Developmental hip disorder (DHD) is a disorder in development of the acetabulum which remains abrupt (dysplasia) and probably consequential cranialisation of the femur head (luxation). Aim of the paper: The aim of this paper is to establish the total number of DHD and its subtypes at the first clinical and ultrasound exam of newborns in a retrospective-prospective study made in the period from 1st Jan 2006 through to 31 Dec 2010 at the Clinic for orthopaedics and traumatology in Banja Luka. Materials and methods: In total 6132 patients were examined and 99 cases diagnosed with DHD (dysplasia and luxation). Ultrasonic exam was done by means of electronic probe of 5-12 MHz according to standard method after Graph. Girls were significantly more present (96%). Positive family anamnesis on DHD was present with 7.8% examinee, mainly with primiparas, and/or with 77.8% children with DHD. Dominant intrauterine risk factors for DHD were: mal position of foetus in uterus (78.6%), oligoamnion (17.9%), malformation of the spinal column of the pregnant woman (3.6%), whereas with 38.4% of children with a certain form of DHD the following were found: breech presentation, caesarean section or twin pregnancy. The clinical exam indicated DHD with 8.87% examinee, out of which hip looseness was found with 5% examinees. Ultrasonic finding was positive with 99 examinee, that is with 1.61% of them (deficient and badly formed acetabulum, sleeked protrusion; 8 luxations and 91 dysplasia). Prophylactic measures were requested by 58.6% children (abductive bending and exercises), whereas 41.4 % needed non-intervention therapeutic measures (traction, Pavlik’s straps, Graph’s knickers, plastering), after which there were no children needing surgical correction of DHD. Conclusion: These data indicate that clinical exam is unreliable for DHD diagnostics, and that Ultrasonic diagnostics and treatment of DHD should start as early as possible applying atraumatic helping devices and procedures in the period when all structures are elastic, flexible and adaptable.

REFERENCES

1. Petković L. Ultrazvučna dijagnostika razvojnog poremećaja kuka u novorođenačkom i odojčadskom uzrastu. DM Grafika, Novi Sad, 2002.

2. Catteral, A. What is congenital dislocation of the hip? J Bone Joint Surg. 1984: 66-B, 469-471.

3. Kokavec M, Bialik V: Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Prevention and real incidence. Bratisl lek Listy. 2007:108(6):251-4.

4. Matasović Tihomil i saradnici. Ultrazvučna dijagnostika sustava za kretanje. Školska knjiga-Zagreb, 1988.

5. Storer SK, Skaggs DL. Developmental dysplasia of the hip. Am Fam Physician. 2006 Oct 15:74 (8): 1310-6.

6. Pajić D. Ultrazvučna dijagnostika razvojnog poremećaja kuka. Stylos, Novi Sad, 1999.

7. Düṕpe H, Danielsson LG. Screening of neonatal instability and of developmental dislocation of the hip. A survey of 132, 601 living nevborn infants betwen 1956 and 1999. J Bone Joint Surg Br.2002 Aug: 84(6):878-85.

8. Graf R. Clasification of the hip joint dysplasia by means of sonography. Arch Orth Trau Surg.1984, 102:284-292.

9. Peled E, Eidelman M, Katzman A, Bialik V. Neonatal Incidence of Hip Dysplasia Ten Years of Experince. Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rambam Health Care Campus, Haifa, Israel, 5th May 2007.

10. Sahin F, Aktürk A, Beyazova U, Cakir B, Bayunaga O, Tezcan S, Bölükbasi S, Kanatli U. Screening for developmental dysplsia of the hip: results of a 7-year follow-up study. Pediatr Int. 2004 Apr: 46(2) :162-6.

11. Vukašinović Z. Oboljenja dečjeg kuka, Škola za dizajn, Beograd,1994.

12. Barlow TG. Neonatal hip dysplasia—treatment, results and complications. Proc R Soc Med. 1975 Aug;68(8):475.

13. Graf R. Fendamentals of sonografic diagnosis of infants hip dysplasia, J Pediatr. Orthop, 1984:4:735-40.

14. Graf R, Farkaš P, Lercher K, Tschauner C, Lojpur M. Priručnik iz sonografije kuka, Sonogram-dijagnoza-terapija, Stolzalpe, 2001.

15. Graf R, Wilson B. Sonographu of the infant Hip and its Therapeutic Implications, Chapman-Hall, London, 1995.

16. Maxwell SL, Ruiz AL, Lapin KJ, Cosgrove AP. Clinical screening for developmental dysplasia of the hip in Norten Ireland.BNJ. 2002 Apr 27:324 (7344):1031-3.

17. Šoć F. Naša iskustva konzervativnog liječenja prirođenih iščašenja kukova u toku zadnjih 10 godina u SR Crnoj Gori, u „Radovima III kongresa ortopeda i traumatologa SFRJ“, urednik V.Mandić, str.26-32, 1965.

18. Kosar P, Ergun E, Unlubay D, Kosar U. Comparation of morphologic and dynamic US methods in examination of the newborn hip. Department of Radiology Training and Research Hospital Ankara, Turkey 2009.

19. Grissom LE, Harcke HT. Ultrasonography and developmental dysplasia of the hip. Curent option in orthop.11:66-73, 1999.

20. Graf R. Hip sonography diagnosis and management of infant hip dysplasia second edition Springer –Verlag Berlin Heidelberg 2006.

Leave a reply

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>