Left Ventricular and Left Atrial Thrombi in Sinus Rhythm Patients with Dilated Ischemic Cardiomyopathy
Aurora Bakalli, Ljubica Georgievska-Ismail, Dardan Koçinaj, Nebi Musliu, Bedri Zahiti, Agim Krasniqi, Tefik Bekteshi, Basri Sejdiu
Med Arh. 2012; 66(3): 155-158

View PDF Fulltext


Introduction: Ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy offers a favorable terrain for left ventricular (LV) thrombus formation; however, left artial appendage (LAA) may be an additional source of thrombi in patients with dilated heart. The main objectives of this study were to determine the prevalence of LV and LAA thrombi in patients with chronic ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy in sinus rhythm, as well as to reveal echocardiographic predictors for thrombus formation. Methods: The study included 57 patients with chronic dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy in sinus rhythm, who were not under oral anticoagulation therapy. Exclusion criteria included patients with: swallowing problems, acute myocardial infarction, idiopathic and/or non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy, atrial fibrillation/flatter, severe systolic dysfunction. Transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography were obtained for each patient. Results: Mean patient age was 62 ± 10.5 years, mean LV end diastolic diameter was 67.2 ± 5.8 mm, whereas mean LV ejection fraction (EF) was 37.1 ± 4.3 %. LV thrombus was detected in 11 (19.3%) patients; while 23 (40.3%) patients had LAA thrombus. In a multiple regression analysis LV size (p=0.05) and lack of aspirin therapy (p=0.02) showed to be independent LV thrombus predictors, whereas lower LV EF (p=0.02) and larger LAA maximal area (p=0.004) demonstrated to be independent predictors of LAA thrombus. Conclusions: We consider that our study sheds light to the high possibility of LAA thrombi formation in addition to LV thrombi in patients with chronic dilated ischemic cardiomyopathy in sinus rhythm. LV size, LV EF, LAA maximal area and lack of aspirin therapy are shown to be independent predictors of left heart chamber thrombi in this patient category.


1. Israel DH, Fuster V, IP JH, et al. Intracardiac thrombosis and systemic embolization. In: Colman RW, Hirsh J, Marder V, Salzman EW, eds. Hemostasis and Thrombosis: Basic Principles and Clinical Practice, 3rd ed. Philadelphia, Pa: JB Lippincott; 1994: 1452-1468.

2. Bakalli A, Kamberi L, Pllana E, Zahiti B, Dragusha G, Brovina A. The influence of left ventricular diameter on left atrial appendage size and thrombus formation in patients with dilated cardiomyopathy. Turk Kardiyol Dern Ars. 2010; 38(2): 90-94.

3. Lang MR, Bierig M, Devereux RB, Flachskampf FA, Foster E, Pellikka PA, Picard MH, Roman MJ, Seward J, Shanewise JS, Solomon SD, Spencer KT, Sutton MS, Stewart WJ; Chamber Quantification Writing Group; American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee; European Association of Echocardiography. Recommendations for Chamber Quantification: A Report from the American Society of Echocardiography’s Guidelines and Standards Committee and the Chamber Quantification Writing Group, Developed in Conjunction with the European Association of Echocardiography, a Branch of the European Society of Cardiology. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2005; 18(12): 1440-1463.

4. Cerqueira MD, Weissman NJ, Dilsizian V, Jacobs AK, Kaul S, Warren K. Laskey WK, Pennell DJ, Rumberger JA, Ryan T, MD; Verani MS. American Heart Association Writing Group on Myocardial Segmentation and Registration for Cardiac Imaging. Standardized Myocardial Segmentation and Nomenclature for Tomographic Imaging of the Heart. Circulation. 2002; 105: 539-542.

5. ACC/AHA/ACR/ASE/ASNC/HRS/NASCI/RSNA/SAIP/SCAI/SCCT/SCMR/SIR 2008. Key Data Elements and Definitions for Cardiac Imaging. A Report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Clinical Data Standards (Writing Committee to Develop Clinical Data Standards for Cardiac Imaging). J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009; 53(1): 91-124.

6. Flachskampf FA, Decoodt P, Fraser AG, Daniel WG and Roelandt JRTC for the Subgroup on Transoesophageal Echocardiography and Valvular Heart Disease, on behalf of the Working Group on Echocardiography of the European Society of Cardiology. Guidelines from the working group: Recommendations for performing transoesophageal Echocardiography. Eur J Echocardiography. 2001; 2: 8-21.

7. Fatkin D, Kelly RP, Feneley MP. Relations between left atrial appendage blood flow velocity, spontaneous echocardiographic contrast and thromboembolic risk in vivo. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1994; 23: 961-969.

8. Kontny F, Dale J, Hegrenaes L, et al. Left ventricular thrombosis and arterial embolism after thrombolysis in acute anterior myocardial infarction: Predictors and effects of adjunctive antithrombotic therapy. Eur Heart J. 1993; 14: 1489-1492.

9. Stratton JR, Lighty GW, Pearlman AS, Ritchie JL. Detection of left ventricular thrombus by two-dimensional echocardiography: sensitivity, specificity, and causes of uncertainty. Circulation. 1982; 66(1): 156-166.

10. Nixon JV. Left ventricular mural thrombus. Arch Intern Med. 1983; 143: 1567-1571.

11. Lapeyre AC, Steele PM, Kazmier FJ et al. Systemic embolism in chronic left ventricular aneurysm: incidence and the role of anticoagulation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 6: 534-538.

12. Keren A, Goldberg S, Gottlieb S, et al. Natural history of left ventricular thrombi: Their appearance and resolution in the post-hospitalization period of acute myocardial infarction. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1990; 15: 790-800.

13. Stratto JR, Resnick AD. Increased embolic risk in patients with left ventricular thrombi. Circulation. 1987; 75: 1004-1011.

14. Duebrava J, Garay R. The role of transesophageal echocardiography in detection of cardiogenic and aortic sources of embolism in stroke and transient ischemic attacks. Vnitr Lek .2006; 52: 144-151.

15. Manning WJ, Weintraub RM, Waksmonski CA, et al. Accuracy of transesophageal echocardiography for identifying left atrial thrombi. A prospective, intraoperative study. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 123: 817-822.

16. Al-Saddy NM, Obel OA, Camm AJ. Left Atrial Appendage: Structure, Function, and role in thromboembolism. Heart. 1999; 82: 547-555.

17. Handke M, Harloff A, Hetzel A, Olschewski M, Bode C, Geibel A. Predictors of left atrial spontaneous echocardiographic contrast or thrombus formation in stroke patients with sinus rhythm and reduced left ventricular function. Am J Cardiol. 2005; 96(9): 1342-1344.

18. Agmon Y, Khandheria KB, Gentile F, Seward BJ. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients with left atrial thrombus and sinus rhythm: experience in 20 643 consecutive transesophageal echocardiographic examinations. Circulation. 2002; 105: 27-31.

19. Pollick C, Taylor D. Assessment of left atrial appendage function by transesophageal echocardiography. Implications for the development of thrombus. Circulation. 1991 Jul; 84(1): 223-231.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


Ova web-stranica koristi Akismet za zaštitu protiv spama. Saznajte kako se obrađuju podaci komentara.